Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

BHP's injury evidence based on "undisclosed" studies

An appeals court has rejected a major employer's argument that an arbitrator wrongly preferred an injured worker's medical evidence over its own, after finding the employer's expert significantly relied on "undisclosed" epidemiological studies.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Stress amendments to trigger much litigation; and more Defective non-slip strip caused Nauru fall, bench confirms New laws target secondary psychological injuries, cancer Stop-harassment jurisdiction examined in "vile" case Safety inspections by self-driving vehicles to come out of high-spend enforceable undertaking
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank CMS improved WHS compliance, attracted WHS prize