Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Uber case renews push for WHS protections

The case against an Uber driver charged with negligent driving occasioning death in Sydney raises a series of serious safety questions, including why no other entity has been held to account for the fatigue-related fatality, according to unions.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Fire and toolbox ride attract safety charges; and more UV radiation and diseases among six most severe OHS risks of climate change: ILO report Characteristics of WHS complaints examined in Heal case Harmonised workplace exposure limits released; and more Worker sacked for incident-reporting breach wins job back
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank CMS improved WHS compliance, attracted WHS prize