Low sick-leave rates aren't always a positive sign

Do you have employees who never take sick leave? This isn't necessarily a good thing, the International Congress of Occupational Health in Adelaide heard on Friday.

University of Wollongong senior research fellow Dr Christopher Magee told delegates at the Congress that some workers who aren't taking sick leave probably should be.

He said that while absences are costly for organisations, presenteeism could be costing employers more in lost productivity.

In a study of 2500 full-time workers who were surveyed as part of the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, Magee and fellow researcher Peter Caputi aimed to determine absenteeism patterns over a five-year period and consider what work-related factors contributed to them.

They identified four groups of workers with distinct absenteeism behaviour.

The first group, which constituted about a quarter of the sample, took an average of between zero and one day of sick leave a year over five years (the no sick leave group), Magee said.

About a third of the workers took two days of sick leave a year (the low sick leave group), and another third took four to six days off a year (the moderate sick leave group).

The fourth group of workers reported taking 10 to 12 days off every year (the high sick leave group).

Magee and Caputi found the reason those in the last group took a high level of sick leave was because they had higher levels of job strain, more bodily pain and poorer physical and mental health than others.

They found that on average those in the moderate group were less stressed than those in the low sick leave group, and worked less hours during the week.

This indicated they were less likely to "care that much" or to be engaged with their jobs, Magee said.

Those in the no sick leave group, he said, tended to work longer hours than those in the other groups, and had comparable health.

He said these people were likely to fall into two categories: those who were engaged, committed and healthy, and workers who could be characterised by presenteeism.

"[The former] represent a group of people who are highly engaged and want to work," he said.

"These are people who would be very good for organisations to have. They're healthy, they work a lot, and perhaps they're productive."

Those in the latter category "don't take sick leave but perhaps they should", Magee said.

Did you miss...

Don't wait for near misses or deaths to make changes

A court has convicted and fined an employer $450,000 for failing to provide a safe workplace, resulting in an "entirely foreseeable" death, and reminded companies that safety laws require them to proactively prevent and address safety risks, rather than waiting for near misses to alert them to dangers. more

Memorial Day and Westfield send emergency-plan reminder

Ahead of Workers' Memorial Day, and in light of the recent stabbing deaths at Westfield Bondi Junction, employers have been urged to ensure they always have clear emergency safety plans in place, and provide workers with access to psychological support services. more

RTW obligations breached with COVID vaccine refusal

An appeals bench has upheld a finding that a worker's failure to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine while she was injured amounted to a breach of her return-to-work duties and warranted her benefits being cut. more

Fire and toolbox ride attract safety charges; and more

  • Major fire attracts Commonwealth WHS charges;
  • Director charged over apprentice's 30km toolbox ride;
  • Local council sentenced for failing to forward injury claim;
  • Noise duties highlighted for WHS blitz in SA; and
  • WHS Codes of Practice updated in ACT. more
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth