Browsing: Workers' comp decisions (TAS) | Page 5

The deeming provisions of workplace injury laws must not be read in a narrow way that excludes members of the "class of persons" they're designed for, a chief commissioner has ruled.

A major employer has unsuccessfully argued, on appeal, that it gave notice of plans to dispute an injury claim within the required time by sending the claimant an email four days before the limit expired.

An employer's actions in transferring a worker to another state caused him to lose substantial allowances and likely caused his psychiatric injury, but the employer isn't liable for the condition, a tribunal has found.

A recent High Court judgment in an anti-discrimination case does not bar the determination of an interstate worker's injury claim, a tribunal has ruled. However, it rejected the worker's bid for weekly benefits for PTSD arising from bullying and racial discrimination.

A major employer has unsuccessfully argued, on appeal, that a doctor's opinion that a health and safety officer's psych injury arose from workplace bullying was flawed in failing to address the impact of other factors.

A worker has been awarded thousands of dollars in weekly benefits and medical expenses for a psychological injury arising from the "chaos" created by her new employer, after the employer failed to attend a tribunal to contest the claim.

An employer and landowners have escaped an "enormous" damages bill, after an appeals court overturned a finding that they negligently caused a chain of events that left a young motorist with catastrophic injuries.

A superior court has rejected an employer's claim that an injured worker had to do more than provide a medical certificate on his deteriorating condition to trigger its workers' comp obligations.

An employer has failed to recover - under motor accident laws - workers' comp payments made to an employee who developed PTSD after a fatal road crash, with a superior court finding it was never obliged to compensate the man.

An injured worker's post-traumatic stress disorder should have been "ignored" when determining whether he was entitled to damages, a superior court has found on appeal.