Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Heavy jackhammer order may have been negligent

The Supreme Court of Tasmania has accepted that a direction not to let a jackhammer pierce a concrete floor may have constituted negligence, in granting a worker an extension of time to pursue a damages claim.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Stronger workplace safety protections pass; and more Aggressive worker loses vilification-injury claim Audit and engineering advice disregarded in lead up to death and "incredibly dangerous" incident The 20 worst workplace hazards; and more Ethical issues of RTW programs highlighted in review
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank