Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Employer criticised for prioritising financial concerns over safety

An Amcor subsidiary that failed to guard a machine because it was expensive has received a $360,000 fine, after the Victorian Court of Appeal found its original penalty for a fatality was far too low.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Big and small PCBUs enter EUs after volunteer injured PCBU fined over flimsy fence after yet another fall Worker fined $55k; Psychosocial risks targeted; Audit starts Director's duties breached for 18 months; Bill passes; more Under-skilled middle managers suffering burnout, new onboarding regimes required
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank CMS improved WHS compliance, attracted WHS prize