Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Emergency-action policy didn't breach duty of care

A trial judge "set a standard of care well above that which was reasonable" when he ordered an employer to pay $650,000 in damages to a man who was hit by a train while intoxicated, the NSW Court of Appeal has found in quashing the decision.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Employer loses appeal in "recess" case of worker injured outside her workplace perimeter Designer and certifier breach upstream WHS duties Budget allocates millions to "safer workplaces" Deemed job diseases list amended, COVID deleted Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank