Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Risk posed by fire door wasn't "substantial"

An employer wasn't negligent in deciding not to replace a non-transparent fire door, even though it was used hundreds of times a day and the risk of being struck by it was obvious, the ACT Court of Appeal has found.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Worker unlawfully relied on verbal safety instructions Young worker's forgetfulness sends warning on fumes Employer's safety measures defeat renewed damages bid Don't wait for near misses or deaths to make changes Memorial Day and Westfield send emergency-plan reminder
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank CMS improved WHS compliance, attracted WHS prize