Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

Ambiguous safety policy leads to guilty verdict

An employer whose poorly-written policy for exclusion zones was "apt to mislead the ordinary reader", has been found guilty of WHS offences, after a worker was seriously injured in a forklift incident.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Clear records crucial for both business continuity and WHS, PCBUs told after prosecution UMM returns; and Warning issued ahead of stone ban Contractor negligently relied on third parties to report spills Filthy toilets hint at poor WHS standards; and more PCBU fined $375k in unique silicosis case
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Case study: being tuned into remote workers' lives fosters real flexibility and wellbeing Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank