A Federal judge has found that selecting a worker for redundancy, after he raised multiple safety concerns, constituted unlawful adverse action, with his employer failing to prove his termination was due to poor performance and not his exercise of workplace rights.
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.
Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.
Go back to our homepage here.