Login or become a OHS Alert subscriber

High Court ruling does not assist "wrecked" worker, but case reminds employers to be proactive

Workers do not need to exhibit obvious signs of distress or vulnerability for the risk of psychological injury to be foreseeable and enliven the duty to take measures, an appeals court has found in a workload case examining an important High Court judgment.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access OHS Alert by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen OHS Alert before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Director's duties breached for 18 months; Bill passes; more Under-skilled middle managers suffering burnout, new onboarding regimes required Worker fined in first case with WHS and Crimes Act overlap Reforms flagged after COVID charges dropped; and more Technology-facilitated work-related harassment prevalent
Jurisdiction
AustMap Tasmania Victoria South Australia New South Wales Australian Capital Territory Queensland the Northern Territitory Western Australia National / Commonwealth
OHS case studies
Q&A: Wellbeing program reduces stress and anxiety, and targets sedentary risks Food strategy combats brain fog in hazardous industry Boeing review reveals distrust of work safety reporting Four-day week reducing stress and absences at Medibank CMS improved WHS compliance, attracted WHS prize