Browsing: Drugs and alcohol


Insistence on less "invasive" drug test fails in FWC

A white-collar worker has unsuccessfully challenged her dismissal for refusing to provide a urine sample for a drug and alcohol test for "personal medical reasons", with a commission stressing that office-based staff aren't "immune" from drug-related injury risks.


Inquiry blames "safety crisis" on big companies, pay rates

Regulatory strategies aimed at curbing drug use, speeding and driving while fatigued in the heavy vehicle sector are doing little to address the systemic causes of this behaviour, highlighting the urgent need for an independent body empowered to eliminate unsafe economic practices, a Senate inquiry has found.


Out-of-hours offence not a sackable safety breach

In an important ruling on out-of-hours conduct, the Fair Work Commission has ordered the reinstatement of a safety-critical worker who was sacked after he was caught drink driving with a blood alcohol concentration four times over the legal limit.


FWC rejects lozenge claim after failed alcohol test

A worker who claims he failed a workplace breathalyser test because he had consumed medicated throat lozenges, and says he refused to undergo an earlier test because of COVID-19 concerns, has been denied an unfair dismissal remedy in the Fair Work Commission.


Employer not liable for drunk co-worker's act in unit

An employer is not liable for a worker being urinated on by an intoxicated colleague, but companies do have a safety duty to protect personnel from "unpleasant" interactions in accommodation facilities, a superior court has found.


Worksite upgrades ordered for anti-alcohol plans

A major employer's proposed alcohol restrictions for remote locations are unlikely to endanger workers' mental health, but the company should consult with unions on alternative measures before implementing the rules, the Fair Work Commission has found.


Alcohol wrongly blamed for worker's psych injury

Two employers have unsuccessfully attempted to avoid liability for workplace injuries by (in the first case) relying on a consultant psychiatrist's unfounded claim that a worker was a "heavy drinker", and (in the second) contending a condition arose from a non-work-related restraining order application.

Page 1 of 28 | Total articles: 276